Problems With Evolution Series Continues...

These next topics will "stir up the hornets nest." For the record, this is not my intentions at all. As i said before its to provide another fresh perspective to the science community. To name a few subjects coming in no particular order:
1) Human Evolution is Faith
2) 10 to the Negative 330th power and There was a Miracle
3) Rapid Heterosexual Evolution is a Contradiction
4) Microevolution versus Macroevolution
5) The Missing links Aren't There
6) Evolutionary Astronomy is False
7) Fused Chromosomes are misleading
8) God of the Gaps into God Where He Fits
9) Evolution is Chance and the New God of the Gaps

There is a few more not listed and will come. I hope you guys love this as much as me. :) Take care and god bless!

P.S. I want to share this guys photo and his link with you guys. http://www.flickr.com/photos/freejay3/2387714157/

Problems With Evolution (Part 3) Ernst Haeckel’s Embryos

Embryos are used as a corner stone for its bench markers proving evolution true in the science community. The science community purposely uses only eight species to set its argument: a fish, salamander, tortoise, chicken, hog, calf, rabbit, and a human. Any student studying this material of embryos would conclude that “Darwin prevails!” As evolution claims that species are similar have they should share common ancestry, and have the same point of origin in the fossil record. Like for example tigers, jaguars, cheetahs, domesticated cats, and Siber Tooth Tiger. Evolution not only should explain the rapid transformation of this species but its embryonic stages should share similar characteristics to each other. But that is not that’s not always the case at all with the Haeckel’s embryos stage model. Dr. Jonathan Wells an embryologist at Princeton University concluded that this idea of Ernst Haeckel’s embryo’s model ‘falls flat on its face.' Dr. Wells also remarked that he hand selected his original eight species. So if we make the assumption that evolution is true. Then we can assert that Salamanders, Frogs, toads are close evolutionary relatives, and they should develop similarly to each other. But that’s when the argument of embryonic evolution falls apart, because they don't look alike at all compared to the original eight species Haeckel’s model used. This is a major problem with evolution so far.
Evolutionists will try announce that human embryos have gills similar too fish, but that’s not the truth at all. Science has proven that something can share common physical traits but not be used in the same way. Allow me to put this into picture for you. A Fruit fly, a mouse, and an Octopus carry the same genetic material for its eyes. But yet that gene plays a different physical role in how it develops. So that means something can appear to be something but carry a whole different purpose. As a British embryologist Lewis Wolpert claimed this coincidence as a “resemblance of illusion.” The rapid growth of a fetal stage can explain why the excess skin folds exist around the neck. So to put this into perspective for everyone, look at the back of your fingers. If you notice that there are folds in the middle of your fingers. Incidentally, no one debates that they could be possibly gills because that would be considered completely ludicrous. Rather the skin gives extra volume for your finger to make a downward angle. If you pinch the skin at the folds it would prove to be more difficult to bend. That holds true to the fetal stage. The fetus is growing extra skin to co inside for its rapid expansion it will have to under go for later development. But it only gives the illusion that it is. So these “Gills” are not based off of the scientific method if other explanations could be used. So it’s merely a biased opinion that used for the support claims of evolution. Nothing more.
To put a nail into this coffin on this subject, the Haeckel’s model was a “forgery” at its time. The claim came from he altered some of his embryos to look more similar than they do. Furthermore, he only used favorable times in which the embryo development that would resemble more closely to his model. This created a big backlash in the science community at that time. But till this very day its still being taught and the modification to his model was every so slight. This forgery has been kept. So provide a comment why you think that is.

Problems With Evolution (Part 2) Cambridge Explosion of life

The Cambridge explosion was the ‘big bang’ of life about 540 million years ago. This problem provides that life didn’t slowly emerge as Darwin would have predicted. Instead life just exploded out of nowhere and life was plentiful. This poses a large problem that science tries to answer with evolution. The Answer evolution tries to solve this problem is with this was a stage of rapid evolution. Instead evolutionist only backed themselves into a wall by increasing their odds of likelihood, if true evolution is true. It has to provide better answers than this.
Life before the Cambridge explosion was just bacteria and microbes. To put this into perspective for about three billion years till the Cambridge explosion single cell organism existed and all of a sudden ‘bang!’ there was multi cellar organisms. This just begs the question how was this even possible. If anything this has only turned Darwin’s world of evolution upside down and its tree of life.
So, to illustrate this problem if we tried to draw this tree of life through common ancestry you would have nothing close to a tree instead this would illustrate more like grass on a lawn because of this rapid explosion. To make it worse many living organism after the Cambridge explosion just similarly just sprang into existence. Very much like the Dinosaurs, Mammals, Insects, and arthropods, and much more.
This Cambridge explosion has begged the question how would this 150-year-old theory of evolution to explain this. So I leave a comment about how you would explain this through evolution or not. Please no cursing, profanity, and offensive language because it will be edited or even worse deleted.

Problems with Evolution (Part 1) Miller Experiment (Amino Acid)

When I heard about this experiment I was in the height of my Atheism. This experiment only became more of a corner stone for my atheism. But I was really quite unaware of what the experiment really yielded. Some Scientist are withholding the real facts of what really did happen to this experiment.
The materials used in this experiment were strongly in debate with many Geologists and Biochemists during the 1970’s. Biochemist Dr. Marcel Flokin, Klaus Dos, and Sidney Fox claimed, “Miller’s experiment was abolished.” Because the materials were used in the millers experiments were; hydrogen rich methane, ammonia, and water vapor for. But the materials in the experiment were concluded to be wrong. Scientists concluded also that the materials present in early earth were actually; Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen, and water vapor. Of which this materials were actually very hostile for life. The atmosphere was dark and volcano’s eruptions were very common. Needless to say it was very highly unlikely that life could be created from volcanic vents or in ponds because the temperature of the earth was too high to sustain life long enough for it to have a chance anyway.
The “amino acids” created were considered a farce. Actually, it was laughed at in the science community. To make it worse, the results of this experiment were Cyanide and Formaldehyde! Anyone with any basic knowledge of biology would conclude this material isn’t very good for your health. This toxic material would have killed every kind of life in the early earth. Furthermore, this material can instantly fry any organic protein instantly. The question is why this experiment is still being taught.
So I leave comments open why do you think that is so? Please no cursing, profanity, and offensive language because it will be edited or even worse deleted.